The article "Mom and Me" by Wayne Wiegand also makes this point from a slightly different angle. The highly confusing sentence, "different people use different information differently to make sense of their worlds" is actually highly important for librarians to understand and put into practice. As Wiegand explains in his article, what one person values as an important source of information, as a librarian values books, another person may consider relatively unimportant compared to word-of-mouth information from family and friends. Librarians need to set aside their own assumptions of worth and consider how they can best assist a patron using the patron's valued information sources.
The final article "Museums, Management, Media and Memory: Lessons from the Enola Gay Exhibit" by Elizabeth Yakel stood out from the rest. It describes the controversial exhibit at the Smithsonian Museum of the plane that dropped atomic bombs on Japan and information surrounding that event. I could expound on several parts of this article that interested me, but I particularly like the part about how museums have transitioned from only portraying one "accepted truth" in an exhibit to exploring different opinions and sides of an issue. I think this relates to libraries specifically in that libraries used to try to influence their patrons' reading habits by acquiring materials that they considered good or moral. Today, however, libraries are moving towards greater inclusiveness of materials by purchasing books that represent a variety of viewpoints, even those that the librarians themselves might strongly disagree with. I think this is a vital phenomenon in that it supports individuals' freedoms and rights to access of information.
No comments:
Post a Comment